News
A guide for financial advisors in a volatile market
Cryptocurrency custody can be a challenging topic, as there are many options that investors and advisors face when considering the storage, security, and accessibility of digital assets. In today’s main article, Todd Bendellby Amphibian Capital, explains the different custody options that financial advisors need to know.
Meredith Yarbrough by LaHoja Capital Partners answers questions about bitcoin custody and collateral in today’s Ask an Expert question.
In the dynamic world of cryptocurrencies, strategic foresight is a necessity. Financial advisors seeking to navigate this volatile landscape must understand the full spectrum of cryptocurrency custody options, balancing innovation with risk management to optimize client portfolios.
Personal custody: the ultimate control
Opting for self-custody is equivalent to holding the reins of responsibility. This approach involves protecting private keys via cold storage: hardware wallets isolated from online threats. It is a fortress of solitude for cryptocurrencies, offering maximum security but requiring technical acumen. For the savvy investor or privacy-conscious individual, self-custody is best suited to those who prioritize absolute control over their digital assets.
Carrying Case: Convenience with a Problem
The convenience of carrying it in your bag cannot be overstated. Cryptocurrencies remain easily accessible, facilitating quick transactions. However, this method is not without its pitfalls: security is only as strong as the platform’s weakest link. There is a paradox here: the more convenient the access, the greater the vulnerability. THE collapse of FTX highlighted potential vulnerabilities and the importance of selecting platforms with strong, transparent security practices and regulatory compliance. Consultants must therefore choose platforms with military-grade security protocols, yet even the most fortified castles have fallen.
Off-exchange solutions: institutional guarantee
For those managing significant assets, off-exchange custody solutions represent a strategic chess move. This type of arrangement can include additional layers of verification by involving a third party in authorizing transactions, aligning with the rigorous demands of institutional investors. It represents a strategic blend of old-world banking security and the efficiency of new technologies.
Investing in CryptoQuant funds
Venturing into crypto quantum funds offers a compelling narrative. These funds use high-frequency trading algorithms and other market-neutral strategies, potentially reducing risks through diversification and sophisticated strategies. This method can enable long-term, diversified exposure to flagship cryptocurrencies while minimizing the complexities and risks typically associated with managing and directly custodying cryptocurrencies.
Navigating the regulatory landscape
Advisors must also master the complexities of the regulatory frameworks that govern digital assets. The landscape is as politically nuanced as it is technologically advanced, requiring a judicious balance between compliance and strategic innovation.
In summary, integrating cryptocurrencies into investment portfolios requires a confluence of knowledge, strategic acumen, and a deep understanding of risk. The paths of self-custody, on-exchange custody and innovative off-exchange solutions offer different strategies that satisfy different needs. Whether holding assets directly or investing in algorithm-driven funds, the key is to leverage these tools to achieve superior results, reminiscent of the digital asset ethos of bold and strategic innovation.
Q. What do credit fund managers look for when choosing a custodian for bitcoin collateral assets?
Credit fund managers prioritize minimizing business risk when selecting a custodian for bitcoin collateral. Because bitcoin collateral is typically held for the life of the loan, custodians are evaluated for their long-term sustainability, including their audit practices and business continuity plans. Security is also a key concern; managers evaluate both general security policies and specific procedures tailored to bitcoin, along with any additional services the custodian might offer. The biggest challenge in choosing a custodian is the lack of standardization as many institutions adapt traditional frameworks to include bitcoin programs.
Q. How does bitcoin collateral custody differ from traditional asset custody?
While there are shared concerns such as cybersecurity risks for both traditional and digital assets, bitcoin custody comes with unique challenges. For example, cyber risks associated with digital assets can potentially translate into physical risks through unauthorized access to keys. Competent bitcoin custodians mitigate this risk by implementing robust key ceremony procedures, in which keys controlling assets are distributed across multiple geographic locations with strict protocols governing their access and use.
Q. Is it possible to insure bitcoin assets?
Obtaining insurance for bitcoin assets is possible, although it is not a common practice among credit managers handling bitcoin collateral, similar to the lack of standard insurance policies for traditional financial assets. Managers, however, rely heavily on rigorous security protocols and existing regulatory frameworks to protect these assets.
Note: The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.